User:Honnab/Evaluate an Article

The Sexual Objectification article provides a quality lead section. The first paragraph is a complete definition of what sexual objectification is, which helps the reader in the overall understanding of this page. The details given in this section give a good overview of the information contained within this article.

While the overall content of this article is written a neutral tone, the information could be updated. There is a lack of recent sources, and the overall information within the article is lacking. There is more general knowledge provided in the male section of objectification, which could be looked at as a bias. The information contained in this article, although it does not persuade the reader, is lacking in places. Although there is information provided about marginalized groups, there could be more content about each group. For example,while there are details about the fetishization of black and Latina women, there are little to no details about the objectification of male BIPOC groups.

The overall formatting of this article made the content easy to follow. The article is organized by sections, and the information contained in each section pertains to that section. Although, there are minor grammatical and spelling errors in this article. There are a few images within this article that are relevant to the topic and add more detailing to the information in the text. Each image is well captioned and laid out in an aesthetically appealing way. Amongst the talk page in this article, there is much discourse. The article has undergone many changes from it's original from. This article is included in various Wikiprojects.

Overall, this article is lacking in information. It could be improved by adding some more recent sourcing, fixing minor grammatical errors, and adding more information about marginalized groups. It provides a brief overview of objectification, but I'd like to see more information and effort put into this article.

Which article are you evaluating?
Sexual objectification

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article as this is an important topic to me.

Evaluate the article
The Sexual Objectification article provides a quality lead section. The first paragraph is a complete definition of what sexual objectification is, which helps the reader in the overall understanding of this page. The details given in this section give a good overview of the information contained within this article.

While the overall content of this article is written a neutral tone, the information could be updated. There is a lack of recent sources, and the overall information within the article is lacking. There is more general knowledge provided in the male section of objectification, which could be looked at as a bias. The information contained in this article, although it does not persuade the reader, is lacking in places. Although there is information provided about marginalized groups, there could be more content about each group. For example,while there are details about the fetishization of black and Latina women, there are little to no details about the objectification of male BIPOC groups.

The overall formatting of this article made the content easy to follow. The article is organized by sections, and the information contained in each section pertains to that section. Although, there are minor grammatical and spelling errors in this article. There are a few images within this article that are relevant to the topic and add more detailing to the information in the text. Each image is well captioned and laid out in an aesthetically appealing way. Amongst the talk page in this article, there is much discourse. The article has undergone many changes from it's original from. This article is included in various Wikiprojects.

Overall, this article is lacking in information. It could be improved by adding some more recent sourcing, fixing minor grammatical errors, and adding more information about marginalized groups. It provides a brief overview of objectification, but I'd like to see more information and effort put into this article.