User:Houstontonorman/History of cross-dressing/Hazelanon Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I'm reviewing Houstonnorman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Houstontonorman/History of cross-dressing Link to the current version of the article

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, your article does a really great job at explaining cross dressing in early Christian history as well as the possible motivations behind cross dressing during this era. I enjoyed reading about the possible interpretations of cross dressing in early Christian history.
 * 2) I suggest that you include citations for your references when necessary. Although you did a great job at including the author’s name throughout your writing when necessary, citations would be great! I believe if you click the “ at the top of the article, you can look up a reference or manually enter it, then re-use it throughout the article!
 * 3) I think the most important thing you could do to improve this article would include any examples of important figures that participated in cross dressing! It would be fascinating to learn more about who exactly was participating and whether it was deemed tasteful or distasteful to the rest of society depending on the person. We’ve learned a lot about how wealth can transform perspectives on individuals, so I wonder if it was more acceptable for figures with lots of money to cross dress.

- “Kristi Upson Saia discusses how the church reacted and dealt with the accusations and proof of saints cross-dressing.” This is interesting! I would like to know more about what Kristi had to say on cross dressing and how the church reacted/dealt with it!

My Personal Takeaways - I’ve been pretty nervous about making large edits to my own article, so you’ve definitely encouraged me to be more confident about what I’m writing and include more!

Extra Notes - The structure of this paragraph is great, just needs some extra information, but I know nobody is quite done editing yet, so Great Job! The content is neutral and easy to understand which is awesome. I would add a few more sources, but what you have now are also great and contribute a lot! I also think all of your information so far is relevant to the topic and your article, so keep improving!