User:Howardsl/sandbox

The article I choose is soul food. The things in the article I chose does not just talk about soul food it talks about slaves, cookbooks, and diets. The piece that distracted me is when they started to discuss animals being hunted in the Native area of the U.S and how certain parts of the animal body is used for food. The only neutral thing about this article is the definition and that it is Black American Culture. This article was over represented when it stated talking about health and animals period it make me not want to eat soul food when I think of the greatness ,and I think of how good the food is and not where it come from and the health of it. Most of the things in the article is true and is discussed when it come to food period. The greatness of the food is missing and the taste, smell, and touch of it and people opinions on soul food. This article is not apart of any wiki projects, but have multiply articles on soul food. Wikipedia discusses things different than the way we discusses it in class because it get different people opinions as a whole more than just one person opinion on a topic and what they know. My overall opinion on this article is that it discusses what the person that wrote this know and not to many people opinion on soul food. Soul food need to be discussed more and why people love it so much. I did not like the way it discuss so many different things and where it comes from(animals)and the health life which is important but not really to those that love soul food.

Peer Review: My partner did a good job at adding sources and discussing climate change. He could add more specific details on certain topics and clarify them with examples. Overall, he did a good job he can add more comma's and check his punctuation. Give more reasons on how climate change has gotten worst. Need reasoning on why we can't escape climate change, and how it affected and led to certain events that occurred that caused deaths of many immigrants trying to cross the border. Go into more details on the Kyoto protocol and what will happen if rules wasn't set in place. Instead of talking about cars go into depth about what causing climate change like the set up of the earth and when time passes. You just need to talk about more things and give more detail don't spend time talking about one thing and after you done talking about it go back talking about it.

Peer Review: He did good at adding more details ,but can discuss certain topics more and site evidence on the article. He use commas correctly just few areas need to be corrected. Overall you have been doing a good job especially since I'm your partner and you are mines we both help one another out. Just add more details and read what you typing out. Look at other people saying and articles on climate change.