User:Hoya38/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Go the Fuck to Sleep

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it talks about a controversial book, Go the Fuck to Sleep. I had seen it on a stand at a library before, opened it and read a few pages, and thought the concept of a children's picture book with obscene language was hilarious.

Lead Section
I feel that the lead section of the article is very concise. That being said, I feel like it may be too concise in that it does not address many of the article's major sections. However, the lead section does not include information not present elsewhere in the article.

This articles lead section provides a nice introduction, but could use a little more detail.

Content
The article's content is fairly comprehensive and up-to-date. I feel that the content provided is relevant and no extraneous information is presented. The article does not address any equity gaps on Wikipedia, however, as this book written by a male author for entertainment was not intended to address underrepresented populations or topics.

The content of this article is satisfactory.

Tone and Balance
This article has a neutral tone and does not seem to push an obvious agenda. However, I feel that it does not address the controversy surrounding the book in a full manner. The article focuses on the praise the book received from pop figures and celebrities, as well as its Amazon sales, but I do not see any section that points out any backlash that I read about in Miller's article.

This article has a neutral tone but could address more perspectives.

Sources and References
The sources and references of this article, at first glance, seem fairly comprehensive and reliable. From the citations, I could tell that sources written in a variety of languages were consulted, perhaps due to the book's international outreach. However, they lack historically marginalized opinions, although this could be the product of the book not being about a serious topic.

Organization and Writing Quality
The overall organization and writing quality of the article is decent. Sections are appropriate, in order, and break down the major sections of the topic. The writing is also clear and concise with no grammatical errors.

Images and Media
There are only two images in the article: one of the book's cover and one of the author. Both images are well-captioned, well-sized, and adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Talk Page Discussion
There are only a few comments on the talk page discussion. One commenter brought up how they edited the article to improve organization and structure. Another contributor fixed an issue with the article's source verification. The article is rated Start-class and of low importance.

Overall Impressions
Overall, I think the article is a decent piece with adequate content, organization, sources, images, and writing quality. However, I think that the article could incorporate a more comprehensive discussion of the the subject by including the negative criticism and backlash surrounding the book.