User:Hpachel/Hugues Libergier/Cmayer96 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Hpachel
 * Hugues Libergier

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Everything in the lead seems to foretell what is coming later in the wiki page well. I did not feel as though any of the information did not have ample enough of an introduction.
 * The lead is concise and to the point. There is no unnecessary dribble that makes the page hard to comprehend. Short, sweet, and to the point.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * All the content is up to date and seemingly relevant. There is definitely room to expand upon the ideas that you've built. However, the ideas that you have surfaced have all sufficiently been fleshed out and you added a good number of new facts to the page.

Tone and Balance

 * Overall, the content is void of bias in any form. With pages on architects it can sometimes be hard to avoid bringing in forms of bias, but you negated that challenge with grace.

Sources and References

 * The sources that have been added to this page have credit and could not be discredited.

Organization

 * The organization is consistent with other pages in this genre of Wikipedia. Again, there could be some further sections about the architects life that could be expanded upon like "Childhood, Early Life, ect..."

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Your work brings a new, and refreshing take on this page. Overall, the facts that you've contributed have influenced the page in a positive manner. A weakness is that potentially more could have been added. However, that's a loaded opinion as you could say the same for a vast majority of edits that have come from this class. All-in-all I think you have fulfilled all the mandated requirements in a exceedingly well done fashion.