User:Hpj8sv/Romantic Ballet/RM0RFD Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hpj8sv


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hpj8sv/Romantic Ballet
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Romantic ballet

Lead

 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

I like how you added a bit to the lead about the phases of romantic ballet. I think the lead overall does a good job introducing the sections of the article. There is no introduction to the section about Design and Scenography in the intro. It might be beneficial to include some overarching information about the techniques and dress in romantic ballet in the lead if you can find a place to add it in.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

You added a significant amount of relevant information about the romantic tutu, and created sections for pointe shoes and techniques, which enhances the article.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

In the intro, you added a sentence about the three main phases of romantic ballet (zenith, decline, and revival). If you have any further information, I think it would be beneficial to add a section to the article about each of these phases and the stylized ballets you mentioned. Otherwise, the added content is all relevant!

I'm not sure how much information is out there regarding this kind of ballet, but it could be interesting to add a section below Technique detailing what this specific pointe work is, if you think it's relevant. I'm not very knowledgeable about ballet, so this might be irrelevant or basic knowledge.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral?

The content is neutral and elevates the article.

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

All information added to the main article is cited. It might be best to use at least once citation per paragraph. Under "Romantic Tutu" it might be better to add an additional citation at the end of the first paragraph since I believe Wikipedia wants a citation every few sentences. I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think the lead section is also supposed to have citations if applicable. If you have a source for the sentence you added to the lead about the phases of romantic ballet, it might be beneficial to add a citation there, too.

As a note, your citation number 5 has an error message about date values. I'm not sure what that means, but maybe you can try to edit the citation to fix it?

I'm not dedicated enough to read you entire sources, but I skim parts of them. I did find a section in citation 5 talking about femininity. In citation 7, I found information about Marie and pointe shoes. Citation 6 does mention tutus a lot.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

Organization
The added content is very well-written and is easy to understand. I didn't notice any spelling or grammatical errors. I like the sections you added. I think they're important to the topic of romantic ballet and they're organized in a logical way.
 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
If you can find an image for pointe shoes or a gif of pointe work, I think that would be an interesting add, but not necessary!

Overall impressions
You added a lot of information to the article and significantly improved it. Including aspects of femininity, and adding information about pointe shoes and technique broadens the scope of this article. As I mentioned above, if you have information about the phases of romantic ballet, I think it would be beneficial to the article to add a short history section about the three phases you mentioned. Otherwise, it feels pretty complete! Interesting article :)
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?