User:Hryck/Villa La Rotonda/GraceGAC Peer Review

General info
Hryck
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hryck/Villa La Rotonda
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Villa La Rotonda

Evaluate the drafted changes
I really like your addition to the inspiration paragraph, and I think it expands the section in a useful manner. I would potentially add a short description or introduction of Villa Emo differentiating it from the Villa La Rotonda before describing its design, as in my first read through I confused the two Villas while trying to process all of the information.

Your additions to the design section of the article are relevant and well written. Don't forget to add references and hyperlinks to other articles where necessary. When describing the Villa, the sentence "there is evidence that the northeast and southeast facades were slightly favored as actual entrances" could be reworked to include the evidence that points to this conclusion.

Could the sentence "The name La Rotonda refers to the central circular hall with its dome." be included within the lead? This might be helpful information for a reader who is only glancing quickly at the article.

In your description of changes to the Palladio, the sentence "That seen in Palladio's I quattro libri dell'architettura, originally drawn and designed by the architect." could be reworked. Perhaps it could be rephrased as "The first view is that which can be seen in Palladio's I quattro libri dell'architettura, which was originally drawn and designed by the architect."

So far, I think your edits have been well organized and neutral in tone. Perhaps you could read through the remaining sections of the article and see if there is anything more to add. Keep up the good work.