User:Hsbwjuz/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Biophysical chemistry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am taking a biophysical chemistry course right now, so the article caught my eye. I was surprised to see how short this article is, considering how fundamental the physics of biomolecules is to their behavior.

Evaluate the article
Out of the three sections in this article, two of them are irrelevant. I do not think it is necessary for readers to know what institutes or journals are dedicated to biophysical chemistry. The article is missing a lot of things: a history section, discussion of important concepts in biophysical chemistry, applications of biophysical chemistry, and how the subject relates to other subjects. The tone is mostly neutral, though I am suspicious of the institutes section. It only includes one institute, which it describes as "the oldest reputed institute." It is difficult to say if any viewpoints are misrepresented, as the article barely says anything at all. Most of the article contain no citations for its claims. The article contains two citations, a textbook and a press release. Both have working links. A textbook is good, but this one is outdated. A press release is normally not good, but for a basic fact like the one this citation is for, it's good enough. There are no conversations in the talk page. The article is part of WikiProject Chemistry.