User:Hss86/Tabarasan language/Pjb202 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hss86


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Tabasaran language


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The present lead is up to date. All changes have been reflected thus far. The lead's introductory sentence accurately describes what the rest of the article is going to be about. It describes the language's roots by describing that it is part of the Lezgic branch. The lead does include a brief description of the article's section by briefly mentioning the grammatic organization of the article. The only thing that the lead mentions that could be further explained is the difference between the north and south dialects of Tabasaran. The lead is not overly detailed.

Content
All of the content in the article is relevant to the topic. Throughout the article, it describes the grammar and structure of the language. It also briefly describes its different dialects. The one thing that does seem to be lacking is the depth of explanation of its different dialects. The article only describes the different suffixes and the core argumentative cases. The article does not address any historically underrepresented topics. The only underrepresentation it addresses is the Tabasaran language itself because it is not a widely spoken language, only in the Dagestan Republic of Russia.

Tone and Balance
The entire article is written in a neutral tone. No section of the article biasedly represents one position. Every section of the article explains how the Tabasaran language comes together to form words and sentences.

Sources and References
All information is backed up by a reliable source of information. A table describing the consonant systems of the language is cited as well as papers that discuss the language's case, typology, and grammar. The good thing about these sources is that they are thorough and provide an adequate amount of information. The oldest source is from 1998 while the most recent is from 2015. This can be considered relatively recent. The spectrum of authors is diverse enough because there are more than 5 different authors in the different sources cited. The links provided do in fact work.

Organization
As far as organization goes, the article is concisely written. No grammatical errors were found. For the most part it is easy to read and follow. The major points of the article are broken down and clearly labeled.

Images and Media
The only visuals present in the article are tables that show the Tabasaran alphabet and it's consonants. These tables are appropriately captioned and they are properly cited and add a good layer of understanding of the topic. They are laid out in an appealing way which enhances it's ability to transmit information. The tables adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Overall Impressions
The article overall is very written. Information is transmitted via text and tables in a very understandable way. The strengths of the article include having all relevant information included. A weakness of the article however, is the fact that it is short and not many sources are used. as a result. Another thing is that is does not describe the difference in dialects as deeply as it should. Overall however it is very informative of the Tabasaran language and provides information on how the language works.