User:Hterry08/sandbox

Article Evaluation

 * In the tutorial it brought up how at the end of each paragraph usually there should be a citation to where the information is coming from.
 * Some of the synopsis of the book seems to be out of order, focusing more on Violet, then bouncing back to the popular culture of lesions.
 * I don't know if I necessarily agree with the idea that he accurately portrays the adolescent language.
 * The article seems to be neutral in thoughts of the story and what is the point of the book.
 * Everything in the article is relevant to the book and the style of which it was written.
 * The plot section seems to be too long and needs to be shortened as well as adding some references and citations to it since it doesn't have any.
 * When I clicked on some of the links provided in the references, they either didn't come up or went to a page that didn't directly link me to Feed. This seems to be a problem and I would recommend updating the references to this article.
 * Also, not many of the references have links to where the resources can be found.
 * The lead to this article though is easy to follow and sets up the reader for what the article is about.
 * The terms "many believe" and other sayings close to this aren't present.
 * It is a part of the WikiProjects Novels.
 * The article is rated a C-class.
 * When looking at the comments to what will be added, it seems that the resources haven't been updated since 2012, while some have given input on the plot being shortened.

Plan of Action

 * I noticed that there isn't much within the Absalom, Absalom! page with research or citations to the claims that are being made.
 * I would recommend searching for more sources on the internet and other sources to find more information on the book.
 * The plot is long as well, which is something that I would want to shorten and make more concise. (I would also need to read the book/researched thoroughly about the book.)
 * In the talk page, someone brought up how this page didn't have any commentaries linked to it of reactions/reviews to the book, which seems to be something that should be added as well.
 * In comparison to the Light in August page, it seems that Absalom, Absalom! doesn't give much information about the book's characters, analysis, commentary, style, etc.
 * It also seems that in the Light in August page, most of the suggestions and edits were made, while in the Absalom, Absalom! they weren't made. Going into this talk page and looking at the suggestions and seeing the suggestions from others would be a helpful place when trying to help change the overall article and what is already in it.
 * Overall, I would want to contribute more about the book in terms of style, characters, themes, etc while also drawing on commentaries from others about the book. I would need to find research on the internet and then branch from there and see what articles and journals I could find to help strengthen the article as a whole.
 * The organization of what is on this page seems reasonable, but more sections need to be added to give the article more of the depth of what the book is about rather than just a synopsis of the book.
 * I also think I would try to find others who have research done on this book to help build up the references and article itself.