User:Hudson1521/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Westies.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I have read this article before as an interesting one to see the positives/negatives)

Evaluate the article
The Introduction does provide a general description of the topic, however it does not talk about the sections that follow. It is concise and not over detailed. The article placed more of an emphasis on small details rather than providing more rounded information. This article does have a neutral tone and there were no indicators of bias. The article has pulled from a variety of sources including academic articles, news articles, and books. I think the article could have been organized better. Mentioning more precise dates/years would add to the content, as well as adding more informative sections rather than just specific details or topics. The article includes one image but it doesn't add much to the topic. In terms of the discussion page, many people are saying that a lot of information has either been left out, or untrue things have been included. Overall, the article does include some good information, however there is a lot of information that could be added. Additionally, the organization of the article could be improved and structured more in relation to dates. I would say the article is underdeveloped, but has the ability to get better.