User:Hudson1521/Far Westside, Syracuse/JJ415 Peer Review

General info
Hudson1521 & Miloshi525
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hudson1521/Far Westside, Syracuse
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Far Westside, Syracuse

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: They give a very concise summary of their article.

Content: Their updated contents provides more contexts and details about the current Far Westside Syracuse. And they are citing their updated information with the sources they found correctly. The sources are up to date as well.

Overall impression: After reading their updated information, I believe these original web pages are more comprehensive, and the language they use is very clear and easy to understand. I appreciate their hardworking, and looking forward to see more references to be provided.