User:Huilinyan/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Talk:Blood: The Last Vampire (2009 film))

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Vampires have always been widely loved as a cinematic subject. Not only that, but vampires have always been known as a fictional supernatural creature due to the strange historical elements they carry with them, namely their earliest appearance in Western legends as sucking the blood of humans or small animals. This fictional identity, with its mysterious overtones, has increased the desire to explore.)

Evaluate the article
(The article does not contain neutral tone, i.e. the idea that the writing is biased towards a particular point of view. The writer's writing is more critical in nature and contains too many personal positions and ideas. For example: I agree, I disagree and other related terms. Another example: in mixed languages, the author says that the film is mainly in English with some Japanese so she chooses English and Japanese as the language. A more convenient way would be: Language: English and Japanese. The author does not include pictures that are relevant to the content, the presence of which would make it easier for the reader to understand the content. The article does not include a Detailed lead section, leaving the reader confused about the 'merger'. The author's reason for merging the 'last vampire' is confusing to the reader without any background knowledge. The author's title is: "Blood: The Last Vampire-2009 film", but there is no information on the plot, genre, or knowledge of the film in the text. According to the Under-developed reference section, the author uses only a few citations, and the citations are not from reliable resources or reliable publishers but from the author's own publication. In general, the author's writing also has no specific writing structure, lacks photographs, lacks notes and contains a distinct personal stance.）