User:Hundredjshpt/Police brutality in the United States/Dogsarefun123 Peer Review

General info
Hundredjshpt
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hundredjshpt/Police brutality in the United States
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Police brutality in the United States:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead shows a clear understanding of the topic of police brutality. The lead also gives insight into how this police brutality is targeted towards african americans and the effects it has. It is a good set up for the rest of the wikipedia article.

Content: The content added is relevant to the topic, but there are portions of the content that should be taken out. For example anything with an opinion in it, cannot be kept in a wikipedia article as it should be neutral. You say "We must put a stop to the war on drugs", and this sentence is showing a clear opinion regarding the topic. The content is up to date and gives a good insight into some of the circumstances and possible actions.

Tone and balance: Some of the content is not neutral and should be taken out as it shows an opinion (previously mentioned in content section).

Sources and references: The references should be cited within the wikipedia article itself, so a reader knows where certain information comes from reference wise. The references you have are also not all academic sources. The washington post is not an academic source that can be used to support information, it may be better finding a peer reviewed journal as a reference.

Organization: I think it is organized in a good way that is clear for the reader.

Overall impressions: I think you are off to a great start, but there are just some minor changes that have to be made to make sure you can publish your additions.