User:HungryHighway/History of Oklahoma/Bibliography

Evaluation
The article has a huge amount of data contained in it, a lot of which feels cluttered, and the information is sometimes scattered around and almost requires research in and of itself to read. The article definitely needs editing. I did read paragraphs that were overwritten, and a lot of rabbit trails in the content that were not directly relevant to the article itself, such as a discussion of differences of air types across an imaginary line.

I noticed there were several paragraphs in the article that were quite long, and may rely on paraphrasing from the source and should be edited. The article has only 38 sources listed at the bottom, a very small number for such a large article, however many of the sources are books and long reliable articles from respected sources like historical society archives.