User:HunterCharles/3rd century in Roman Britain

[Feedback from Dr Austen - this is a good summary of the content gaps in this article, but no actual additions or draft improvements yet?]

While the article's content is related to the topic, the article itself is vague and does not go into any detail about any of the topics listed. The entirety of the article is merely a chronological list of events that occurred in 3rd century Roman Britain. The content of the article is written neutrally. There are 3 references provided for this article and every single event listed on the timeline but one is cited. 2 of the references appear to be reliable while the last one is from the official BBC website. The article does not discuss anything related to one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. I feel that the article lacks the correct components to be called an article. It does not really go into detail about anything from that era but acts more like a gateway to other topics. Finally, I feel that this article needs a proper lead and more information, which would require more sources, which would then require more research, and thus be more useful for learners.