User:HunterStudent2022/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Anserine)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose this article, because I am interested in using it as my Wikipedia project this semester. I am also interested in it because it was listed as a Stub and could use more information and sources. It seemed fairly brief, so I thought it would be a good page to evaluate.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

While short, the lead section does seem clear and straight to the point. It lists a few key facts about Anserine, but doesn't drag on. The lead doesn't include a brief description of the article's main sections. There are also some things mentioned in the lead section that are not described in the content of the article (pKa/being a buffer). I don't believe the content is up to date and I believe there may be content missing. The last edits took place in 2014 on this page.A brief search in the Hunter library online database showed newer articles that were published in 2018. I believe that more information could be added that is up to date. The tone and balance of the article appears to be neutral. The article is missing ample citations throughout the text. There is also a limited number of sources utilized and most are older articles (most recent being 2018). The article is clear and concise in terms of organization, There is an image utilized on the article, and it is sourced as the Wikipedia User's own work (from ChemDraw). The talk page discussion is incredibly limited, with the most recent addition on the page being in 2014. Overall, this page appears to be a Stub and could use a lot of additional information and citation.