User:Hunterelizabethhill/The Last Book in the Universe/AstariaP Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Hunterelizabethhills Work


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article also appears to be mostly focusing on updating the plot part so I will focus mostly on that

Lead:

Lead appears to be same as article, as to be expected since the plot is the main focus. But the lead is right to the point and concise.

Content:

The content is all related, the plot section doesn't seem to have deviated much from the original article but there seems to be a section that has been removed such as the awards section. Otherwise all content is related.

Tone and Balance:

tone and balance remain neutral and factual. No bias detected.

Sources and references:

Sources all appear to be from appropriate sources. All links work and take you to a website page.

Organization:

Organization is good and easy to navigate. No sections seem to be disorganized or hard to follow.

Images and Media:

No images and media yet, though the overall structure is great. The page looks good and polished.

Overall Impressions:

Over all impressions is that it is really well organized and polished, I would however maybe make a note on the area you are making edits on so it is easier to see what exactly you are working on but over all looks great!