User:Huntsky01/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Kulak: Evaluation: In reference to the Kulak page I first had to determine that it was a quality article based on what I saw in reference to the quality score given on the "talk" page. After I determined the credibility of the page, I started checking citation to ensure they went to appropriate sources and I feel that the sources provided helped to support the claims. From what I've learned on the subject so far, the page seems to keep a neutral standpoint, but I noticed that there are some sub sections that do not seem to be in chronological order. What I noticed on the talk page was as previously mentioned the page had been given a C-class rating on quality and has been given a high-importance rating by the projects importance scale. After reading what some other authors had commented I had to reread the page in entirety to see if updates had been made. From what I saw, people were pointing out that misleading or unreliable sources and not using a neutral viewpoint. Most of the comments were made back in 2013, but I had determined that because of these claims, it had lead to some of the content being removed. Much of what we have read/viewed in class thus far, seems to be here, but as I mentioned, the order of collectivization needs to be put into a better chronological order. I think that there is always room for things to be added, but this could be due to the unknown. I read an article that states that until something like 2013, much of what is known on the subject is still being declassified by the Russian government.