User:Hurricanefan25/Citations


 * Is the work an extended single document, or comprised of identical chapters, and published? It is likely to be a book.
 * Is the work a small unit written by one author, in a work edited by someone else? It is likely to be a chapter.
 * Is the work a small unit written by one author, in a work that is serially published or has an ISSN? It is likely to be an article.
 * Does the work have a unique Volume Title. For example, "Volume 4: Hurricanes of the Antarctic"?  Then that is likely to be the volume title, and the book title is likely to be the other portion: "Hurricanes of the World.  Volume 4: Hurricanes of the Antarctic"  => title=Hurricanes of the World, volume=Hurricanes of the Antarctic
 * Was the work "Unpublished" but short, but issued in a declarative manner by an official body? That's a report!
 * Is the work a whole single unit, but part of a larger publishing series of works of an identical type, with a name for the higher order grouping? Then it is in a |series=
 * Only when you've exhausted those possibilities, is something a citeweb. Websites aren't serially published, but they aren't declarative and official, but they aren't an extended single document.  Particularly when you find a document deep inside a /whole/bunch/of/html/directories/on/a/meteorological/site, it is very likely that the document is part of some other publication, so get out your web browser's location bar, and start removing directories, or click on "Up one level" or "Parent Document" etc...   Websites are really institutional "about this organisation", personal, blogs, or the like, and citeweb is meant for them.
 * Remember, when we evaluate a work, we evaluate what kind of format the document is, not where it is hosted, or how it is available. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2011 (UTC)