User:Hwasnak/Mtorre2vu/Water Footprint/Hwasnak Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Morgan @ Mtorre2vu


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mtorre2vu/Water footprint


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Water footprint

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: These revisions do not update the article Lead, yet the edits do not reflect a new topic or major focal point that would require additional mention in the Lead.

Content: The content added is both up to date and relevant. The edits enable further understanding of the article, as they provide definitions for some potentially confusing terms and context for their importance.

Tone and Balance: The content added is neutral and is not attempting to persuade the reader. All edits are based in factual information.

Sources & References: All new content is backed by reliable secondary sources, accurately reflecting the content of those sources. The sources are thorough, current, and accurately cited.

Organization: The added content is well-organized, and is free from grammar and spelling errors. The content is both clear and concise. Impressively, an effective introduction was added to a complicated section of the article.

Images: There is one image included, and it is similar to one on the main article. However, this version is more appropriately captioned and sized to fit the article. The image is laid out in an appealing manner and adheres to copyright policy.