User:HydrangeaLove/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
× Epilaeliocattleya

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a stub grade plant article with barely any information, in need of great development. It matters because the article has some major issues that need to be addressed. My preliminary impression was that this article is in dire need of help, it is extremely underdeveloped and is missing a lot of vital article components.

Evaluate the article
There is not really a lead section because this article is only a few sentences total. The content of this article is simply a brief description of the plant's scientific classification. While the content is relevant, it is missing detail. The article appears to be only neutral fact. The two sources are dead links that do not work, thus rendering this article without any sources or points of reference. Although the links within the content portion of the article are active and working, they are not supporting references to this article, so it is still lacking sources.There is one good image of the plant along with the scientific classification table which is useful and well done. The taxon identification links are all working and up to date. There has been no discussion on the talk page. The article is part of the wiki project plants with a low priority and stub class ranking. The article's overall status is stub, with its only strength being the scientific classification of the plant. The article can be improved with more detailed information about the plant, such as where it grows, its life cycle, what conditions if favors, etc.. Overall, the article is severely underdeveloped.