User:HydrangeaLove/Hydrangea aspera/MashedLemons3 Peer Review

General info
HydrangeaLove
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:HydrangeaLove/Hydrangea aspera - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hydrangea aspera - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead section has not been updated quite yet to discuss the proposed changes. The introductory sentence is good because it introduces the plant with the family and where it can be found. It does not mention cultivation or the proposed added sections yet. The lead section contains information about the plant anatomy, which is not discussed later in the article. It may be helpful to put that information in the anatomy section instead. Due to this, the lead section is currently overly detailed.

Content
The content is relevant and up to date. The content fills in the previous gaps in the article.

Tone and Balance
The added content is neutral and not biased. The content is well balanced, though the habitat section might need a bit more. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way.

Sources and References
All new content is supported by reliable sources and the accurately represents the sources. The sources are through and current. The sources used are the only reliable ones that are available. The links work.

Organization
The content is well-written and has good grammar. The content is very well organized.

Overall Impressions
The content added has significantly improved the quality and coverage of the article. The added content provides much more information about the plant itself, rather than just how it is cultivated. Additionally, it explains where the plant can be found. More details and structure will help the added content complete the article.