User:Hydriotaphia/Archive 2

Garrett and Young
That thought had just ocurred to me and I came back to edit it only to see you'd caught it already. :p Simon Dodd 00:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

RfC
Hi Hydrio, have you had any thoughts about maybe cancelling the RfC? Things seem to have stabilized at the articles in question, and a minimal amount of reasonableness seems to be prevailing. Please let me know what you think.Ferrylodge 23:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That's fine with me. Let me find out how we can do that.  Hydriotaphia 23:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ThxFerrylodge 23:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Hydriotaphia, I got your message, and what you said about the Rfc is ok with me.Jimmuldrow 22:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Overly controlling behavior
Could you stop the trivial pretexts for acting as if I need your permission to do anything, and the threats?Jimmuldrow 00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've responded to this in the proper location. As I said there, I meant to imply no threat at all, and I am deeply sorry if it sounded like a threat, which I agree would have been inappropriate.  I was expressing only my frustration at what seemed to me to be a renewed unwillingness to engage in discussion.  Hydriotaphia 01:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Harassment charge
Hey Hydrio, are you there? I hope you will set up email at "my preferences" so I can contact you that way. Thx.Ferrylodge 17:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I have started an RfC for the first time. The only other time I participated in an RfC was when you started that one. Anyway, if you feel like taking a look, it's here.Ferrylodge 19:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Why the 3RR Violation?
June 30 to July 1 2008, United States v Morrison. There was no reason for that.Jimmuldrow (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Please check again, Jim. Here, here, and here. Three revisions only. Best wishes, Hydriotaphia (talk)

FAR for Equal Protection Clause
nominated Equal Protection Clause for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Cirt (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Reviewer rights
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)