User:Hypermole115/Covet (Band)/Gcordova1 Peer Review

General info
Hypermole115
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Hypermole115/Covet (Band)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Wiki

Lead


 * Good lead you have a brief overview of the band and give us some information about the type of music they have
 * Concise and to the point

Content


 * The content is relevant and up to date
 * Most of the content belongs and is related to the article
 * No gaps in the timeline of the band

Tone and Balance


 * The article tone is not biased and it simply says the information of the band and the different albums they have created
 * The author doesn’t try to persuade the reader of change their view

Sources and References


 * There are sources in the article
 * They need to be linked correctly so the links can be clicked and accessed
 * Cite the sources in the article itself
 * Add references after sentences where you use the citations below
 * None or minimal spelling or grammatical errors

Organization


 * Clear and concise
 * Bold titles make it easy to find sections
 * Labeled in chronological order
 * Broken down into easy to read sections

Images and Media


 * No images or media
 * Adding some may help improve the look of the article and its appearance

New Articles


 * Meet the notability recs
 * Good sources but you can have more to help your article
 * Follows pattern of other articles
 * Article doesn’t have any links to any other articles

Overall Impressions


 * Good article try adding images and things like that to make it visually interesting
 * Be sure to fix your citations and reference them in the body of the article
 * You did great on the organization and content of the article