User:ICapt.NemoI/Monkeypox virus/Is73500 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? ICapt.NemoI, Solis.eve, Jap23630

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:ICapt.NemoI/Monkeypox virus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Monkeypox virus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Monkeypox virus

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead is quite strong and contains accurate information. It is not overly detailed and contains relevant information. It is also possible to add more that reflects more information expressed in the article, but as far as "Prevention" goes, it is thorough enough.

Content

The content in this section is relevant to the topic and is quite up to date. Because it was mentioned that there are three different smallpox vaccines in the US, it couldn't hurt to mention the name of the third one even though it is not currently used against the Monkeypox virus. It seems like it is missing even though it is not directly related to the virus. I don't see any information that does not belong.

Tone and Balance

Everything added seems to be quite neutral and without a bias. I don't see any sort of persuasion and no over or underrepresented viewpoints.

Sources and References

While there are already five added sources which shows that information was taken from many different viewpoints, there is always room to add more, which will give you the ability to make changes in sections other than just "Preventions." However, these five sources seem to be up to date and reliable. The authors look reputable and they seem relevant to the information added.

Organization

Overall, the edits seem well-organized. If possible, I would try and put "Still, the ... smallpox vaccine" and "People who ... get vaccinated" closer together and possibly in the same sentence, as both sentences talk about who is recommended to get vaccinated, and having it be two sentences at two different parts of the paragraphs seems slightly redundant. Also, I would change "MVP" to the full "Monkeypox virus," as it is not abbreviated earlier in the article and may cause confusion. Another option is to use MVP in a sentence that previously used the full "Monkeypox virus" to clarify that it is an abbreviation. Otherwise, everything seems well-organized and easy to read.

Images and Media

There are no images or media added. It could be useful to include images of the effects of the Monkeypox virus or of the vaccines. While not necessary, they could add to the article and give the reader more information.