User:ICapt.NemoI/Monkeypox virus/Microbio15 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ICapt.NemoI, Jap23630, Solis.eve


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ICapt.NemoI/Monkeypox_virus?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Monkeypox virus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

No content has been added to the sandbox draft for this article, however the references have been added to the "bibliography" section. The sources added seem like they come from reliable peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Since no content was added to the sandbox draft, I will consider the current version of the article for my review.

Lead section: This is a strong lead section so far. The introductory sentence includes a brief description of the major sections, it is about two short paragraphs, so not overly long or detailed.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic, it is somewhat up-to-date, morphology/physiology seems to be missing although media depicts the virus, I do see content that deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps/addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations/topics.

Tone and Balance: The article is neutral, no claims that seem to heavily bias a particular position, no attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References: Sources are thorough, somewhat current, and the links I clicked work.

Organization and writing quality: Article is concise and clear. I did not see any spelling errors. Well organized sections that reflect the major topic.

Images and Media: Article includes several images that enhance the topic. Some images are well captioned and detailed- describing the image such as being "colorized transmission electron micrograph of monkeypox particles".

Talk page discussion: This article has been part of an AP Biology student, it is unclear if it is a WikiProject that occurred in the past (2008). Discussion going on include those such as a merge proposal- to merge the Monkeypox Virus page with the Monkeypox Disease page.

Overall impressions:

This is a great article, the strengths include having a strong lead section and images that are well captioned. In the talk session somebody mentioned calling attention to a feature article from the Washington Post, and it may be something to consider looking into adding more relevant information. Current articles from this summer seem to be included and describe how transmission occurs, but the recent articles do not seem to describe morphology/physiology.

Potential sources for morphology/physiology:

Minasov, George et al. “Structure of the Monkeypox virus profilin-like protein A42R reveals potential functional differences from cellular profilins.” ''Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications'' vol. 78,Pt 10 (2022): 371-377. doi:10.1107/S2053230X22009128