User:ICapt.NemoI/Monkeypox virus/Zec57612 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ICapt.NemoI


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The classification section has good information, but I think that the structure of the bacteria should be in a separate section with the provided picture. The comparison picture is very interesting.

For the prevention section, I think this section could be broken down into other subsections such as : vaccines, history, origin, spread of virus, etc. This section has comprehensive information, it just lacks organization and citations.

I also think it is important to be careful when talking about how the vaccines were "presumed" to protect against smallpox. This sounds like hearsay especially when there is no source to provide evidence for this.