User:IDIC-Linguist/Sofia Ongele/Foureyeslinguistics Peer Review

General info
Gizelleg25, IDIC-Linguist, Scribepedia
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IDIC-Linguist/Sofia_Ongele?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sofia Ongele

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? I would say she appeared or was featured in the documentary, I feel like the use of "star" means a fictional role.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?It seems pretty neutral to me, discussing her life and experiences.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It focuses heavily on her activism and coding experience.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? " She also began providing coding mentoring to her peers." doesn't have a citation and I feel like it's a claim that needs one. The previous sentence said "at 17..." so does that still apply to this sentence or was it later?
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are a lot of sources and they seem to be reliable.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? With so many sources, it seems like there could be more to add. In the sandbox, there was a note about how the app had the ability to have information deleted for privacy or it could be taken to the police as evidence, I think this could be incorporated into the information about the app.