User:IDOSALSA101/Cybersecurity engineer/Vgs0208 Peer Review

General info
IDOSALSA101
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:IDOSALSA101/Cybersecurity Engineer:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Computer security

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - The lead basically says the same thing as in the original article but its worded differently.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - The lead has brief description, but i think you could explain slightly more on what topics you will cover.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - Maybe you could add a section and/or more information on the high demand due to increasing number of cyber threats.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - The lead is more concise than overly detailed, but can use slightly more info. like telling us what topics you will talk about

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, I think the content covered is all based on your topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - from the information i see, I clicked on the sources you have and they seem up to date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - in the section "professional organizations" I believe you can add more information as to what that specific organization does.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - No, but perhaps you can add a history of your topic as a section

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - yes, the content is neutral; its informative and not bias
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?- no, there doesn't seem to be any bias statements
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - like mentioned before, you could touch on the history of cybersecurity engineer
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - no, the content does not take any sides, its mainly informative.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - no, I think something you can work on is finding more sources to back up your statements because i do see a lot of information that isn't backed up by a source
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) - Some of the sources do, the other ones are hard to read and i cant really find the same information you provided.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - The sources are definitely bout your topic, but like said before, some are confusing to read or navigate.
 * Are the sources current? -yes, the sources are current
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - yes, you have sources that are organizations, and with different authors
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)- yes, if you go on the SFSU library and search for your topic there are many more sources you can look into. It will give your more information to work with.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - yes, i would say your content is straight forward and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - on the salary/job outlook section there is a "/" in the first sentence that i think is not needed.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - yes, the content is well organized and put into specific sections.

Images and Media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - so far there is still no images.

Overall Impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - i think it adds more information as to how to become and cybersecurity engineer
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - information as to what one goes through to be in that field
 * How can the content added be improved? - it needs a lot more sources to help support each information provided