User:IFlyYouLand/Opposition (politics)/Will randolph27 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

IFlyYouLand, Ninambeans


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Opposition (politics)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Opposition (politics)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I appreciated how the article was short and concise. Sometimes people will jam-pack as much information as they can into an article to make it appear more professional but this article was right to the point and painted a clear picture of the topic. The last sentence outlining how authoritarian and Democratic societies view opposition differently gave me a better understanding of the subject.

I would suggest finding more sources since there is currently only one reference. This would give the article more credibility. A source that gives a more specific example of Opposition in action would definitely be an improvement on the article.

The article is short because it is a work in progress but as it gets fleshed out with more information I would suggest splitting it into sections.

The one reference comes in the form of a fully functional link. The article is completely neutral and I could not find any biases.