User:III.V.MDCCLXX/Ratlines (World War II aftermath)/TM-307 Peer Review

General info
(Emily)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing :User:III.V.MDCCLXX/Ratlines (World War II aftermath) - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ratlines (World War II) - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Though it seems to have gone unchanged the lead largely seems to accomplish its job by a general overview of what the ratline was, its major routes and Most of the major organizations involved, aside from maybe ODESSA being mentioned. And while this blurb at the end could be included in the article I'm unsure that a largely disregarded conspiracy belongs in the lead.

As for the tone, largely I thought it was broadly in line with Wikipedia's more neutral tone, nothing particularly stuck out to me, but I would not be surprised if I missed some.

As for sources this seems like the largest, or at least most apparent area for improvement, though a as many sections is lacking citation or better sources, though it seems apparent that mending this is the editor's primary area of focus for this article.

The contents of the article all largely seem to be relevant topics to the foundation and operation of the ratline or at least related topics, as the Finnish ratline does not seem to quite fit the lead description at the top as it was mainly a means to return to Germany rather than flee Europe altogether, but I could see its inclusion being warranted in the article.

Largely speaking the articles organization seems to make sense enough.