User:III.V.MDCCLXX/Ratlines (World War II aftermath)/ThorsTumTum Peer Review

General info
III.V.MDCCLXX
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Editing User:III.V.MDCCLXX/Ratlines (World War II aftermath) - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ratlines (World War II) - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is concise and provides relevant background information on the topic. I think it is a solid lead and could be left alone.

Content added gives some extra insight into certain people and their actions in aiding the ratlines, I think it was good information to add and just needs to be properly cited.

Some words and sentences could use a little reworking and spell checking, but otherwise the article seems to flow nicely and is written in a neutral tone of voice. Most the issues lie with the citations and references, and even those aren't very substantial. I think a few citations added with information added will make it more solid. I believe some images may help the visual attractiveness of the article and give a bit more to the article as well.

The different sections covering the different ratlines is a great way to organize it in my opinion, I think it broadens the article and points to how widespread these lines became. I think the article overall is very good, well written with good information. The citations are the main issue, several spots (some marked some not) should have some type of substantiating citation.