User:IIOliveBranchII/Juana Paula Manso/MahHdz01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Apmnicley


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Apmnicley/Juana_Paula_Manso?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Juana Paula Manso

Evaluate the drafted changes
There were no changes made to the lead article. I definitely don't think its necessary because of the nature of the article, but if you wanted to expand you could possible go into greater detail about her magazine/background in education or where she's lived/is from.

The content is great! You've done a really good job at creating a thorough and interesting biography from almost nothing. Everything makes sense and contributes to the article, and seems accurate and up to date.

The tone is very good. It stays neutral while still being interesting and providing a lot of detail on her life. I also think it really added to the article with the terms you chose to link to other articles.

The sources are good. Given that the article is about a lesser known historical figure there is a really good variety of sources. They all come from journals and are reliable. The source article is also on a marginalized person, so it does a great job of filling in the equity gaps.

The organization and writing are really good. The structure is clear and the grammar is correct all the way through. Because there is limited information I don't think having separate sections is necessary, but if you wanted to, you could do early or personal life as one section and professional career as another.

Instead of changes the article is mostly additions, but these additions are all needed. This greatly improved the article and did a lot to fill equity gaps.