User:IPres10/sandbox

Selected Article

Discuss your choices with your instructor. Make sure your selections are clearly marked in your sandbox along with your notes to improve the articles.

Start compiling a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. You can keep a running list of these sources in your sandbox to reference easily when you start writing.

1) Māui - Add more sources and more info

- Very lightly touches all myths of Maui

-Very few sources

Evaluation


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? -
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * What else could be improved?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Yes everything was relevant and nothing really distracted me. Some information may be outdated and things could be added to show how truly powerful he was. The article is neutral and there are no biases. The links do not work but yes the source supports the claims. It differs because we do things chronologically and Wikipedia really goes by big events in headers to attract the reader.

User:IPres10/newsandbox