User:IShadowed/Archive 1

Rushbrook Williams
hi Dylaniloveyou,

i don't understand why those 'multiple issues' were added to this article. the article is not a personal reminsicence, it has information about the person. every claim is backed up by sources, with full details given. there are multiple sources. i don't understand how it qualifies as a 'fan site'-- this person is a historical personage who had no wikipedia entry under his name. there is no praise or acclaim in the article. -- jlburton

Civil war edit
the sentence that you reverted now reads "In many ways, the conflict's central issues – the role of constitutional federal government, the rights of states, slavery and the treatment of African-Americans – are still not completely resolved."

The slavery part needs to be taken out - it is inaccurate, there is no slavery in the U.S. in 2009. That is a simple fact. If you would like to debate or re-revert this, please explain your reasons on the talk page of the article. ThanksMajorite (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah, yes very true. Sorry, I must've missed that part! DylanIloveYou (Talk) 00:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

ha, haMajorite (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Good job
Re your message: Thanks. It is never ending it seems. And thank you for all of the work you have put in, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Howdy
Just wanted to drop a line and say thank you for the kind message, it was a pleasant surprise amidst a lot of the muck with which I am becoming accustomed. :] Cheers! Remnar (talk) 01:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Please be careful to use the appropriate templates when tagging articles for speedy deletion; Pyshcological Diplomacy was not patent nonsense (gibberish letters, keyboard-mashing, etc.), since its grammar was comprehensible. A better deletion rationale may have been db-spam (as it was made just to direct traffic to an external site) or db-nocontext. For a good explanation of when the tag should be used, you can check out User:Balloonman/CSD G1 survey.

Thanks for your help maintaining the project, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 01:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, thank you for bringing this to my attention, I believe I hit the wrong button. Sorry again, I'm working on it. DylanIloveYou (Talk) 02:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries, it's understandable :). Keep up the good work, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Users removing warning templates
Hello! Just to let you know, a user can remove any messages from their talk page as they wish, as was done here. You recently warned that user for removing messages addressed to them, though that is perfectly fine. Also, you may want to consider starting out by placing level one warning templates instead of level three warnings on the talk pages of users who vandalize when it is their first time and they have not been warned for a while. This welcomes users, and allows them to adjust and possibly start making constructive edits. Thanks and happy editing, ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 02:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for bringing this to my attention: I will make sure not to do this is the future. DylanIloveYou (Talk) 02:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
Thanks for the nice welcome message! I want to know what opportunities to get started and help out are available. Reubzz (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

You requested help!
Hello, how may i help you? -- Dwayneflanders (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, because I tend to be stupid sometimes I forget the names of the anti-vandal tools I use. I use firefox and I have the "tb", "wel", "warn", "arv", "csd", "last", "rpp", "xfd" and "unlink". So, what tool or tools do I use and where can I add more or remove some? DylanIloveYou (Talk) 02:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thats not a stupid question, you would find this under gadgets in My Preferences then you will see how you can add and remove tools. Easy!-- Dwayneflanders (talk) 02:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DylanIloveYou (Talk) 02:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, for anymore questions you may have please add the helpme template again on your talk page and someone from the IRC Channel will help you as soon as possible. Cheers,-- Dwayneflanders (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Richard J. Coffee
Hi there.

I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of the article, as it indicates that the subject may be significant. That is all that is required to pass speedy deletion criterion A7. Feel free to ask if you have questions. Regards, decltype (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Zoomer (NES accessory)
Maybe you want to nominate Zoomer (NES accessory) for speedy deletion too. Pdcook (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: THE BIRTH OF THE GIANT
Hello DylanIloveYou, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (THE BIRTH OF THE GIANT) under a criterion different from the one your provided, which was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific to protect the encyclopedia, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! NW ( Talk ) 23:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Request for rollback
Who do I ask for rollback permissions? DylanIloveYou (Talk) 02:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:PERM, But I would try and get a little more experience before requesting. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 02:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Blood+ Revert
On my talk page it says that an edit I made to the Blood+ article did "not appear to be constructive and has been reverted". I have since then been going back and forth with Collectonian about whether we should use Cartoon Network (CN) which she favors or Adult Swim (AS). The edit I made was changing CN to AS and the reasons I gave are on the talk page. The Nielsen Ratings for CN and AS are calculated separately which means that saying it aired on CN is misleading since the ratings for it are based on AS's. Additionally, she has claimed multiple times that a consensus was reached on this but I cannot find it after looking on the Blood+ talk page and archives, the CN talk page and archives, and the AS talk page and archives. With all of that in mind, could you please explain your comment on my talk page and why my Blood+ edit did not appear to be constructive? Thanks! Argel1200 (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * In the entirely too impatient department, could you please revert like you discussed on my talk page -- or did you just want me to revert it? I personally would like to at least have my edit declared as not vandalism! Thanks a bunch!! Argel1200 (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Nulling helpmes
Hey IShadowed. Noting your edits to the helpme code over at the IP's helpme request, I thought you might not know about, which is what we normally use when the request is included inside the template code, e.g.,  , which becomes. Cheers--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I was confused!  IShadowed  ✰  00:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Reply to you help
Hello ISHadowed. You asked about a link and I actually meant the article that I was about to move. Thanks for chekcing in,m but I think I've had my question answered. Lumenlitt (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Help
Hey... I cannot access IRC channels through a public computer using ChatZilla, so what other websites can I use? Thanks,  IShadowed  ✰  00:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There's a freenode web java one. A few more: IRC. --  fetch  comms  ☛ 00:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: LOL like a lollipop
I was working off of the text from the speedy deletion page. It says "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. What tag would you recomend for that one then?Cathardic (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Moss
Regarding this edit, you should know that WP:CSD does not apply to moss. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't know!  IShadowed  ✰  20:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. If you have any questions about a specific CSD criteria, feel free to ask. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. NW ( Talk ) 03:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Elnik systems
The user blanked a page which they had created, Elnik systems, therefore the page was eligible for deletion under CSD G7, I've tagged the page, but do you think you could kindly remove the warning from the users talk page please? Good work in the RCP otherwise, kind regards SpitfireTally-ho! 20:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, when I saw the page I thought the user had blanked a page they had not created. I'll be sure to remove the notice. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  IShadowed  ✰  20:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Not a problem, its a very common mistake, one that I myself have made on several occasions, SpitfireTally-ho! 20:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Forest Brook High School
Hey there. I declined your speedy deletion tag for this page because you tagged a vandalized version of the page. In the future, please check to make sure that there is no clean version to revert to before tagging the article. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 21:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, sorry! I'm make sure to keep that in mind  IShadowed  ✰  21:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Huh?
Why did you do this and then template a new user's talk page? She's trying to start a new article on a Latin American novel. I think it's fairly obvious that she's trying to add content, but is having a hard time figuring out the format. Please don't bite the newbies! --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * (copied from my talk page:) OK, no problem. She was making something of a mess of things, but was fairly clearly a good faith contributor trying to start their first article (in this case in part by importing a template from WP:NOVEL, I think.  So yes, it was formatted all wrong and the edit history was confusing.  But you can get a sense from this as to what she's trying to do.  I know, it may take a little time to work it all out.  But that's the situation for a newbie, too, trying to figure out how to start a page!  Anyhow, yes, it'd be nice if you dropped her a little note to apologize and explain the misunderstanding.  --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 19:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this. Good job! :) --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 20:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:NEWT
I personally don't have an opinion on WP:NEWT, it makes a point but also wastes a little time :(. I guess it's just frustrating because people think they can just write whatever and let other people clean it up. The more you see, the harder it is to distinguish between bad and good material... while not trying to bite, to boot. But the articles you made weren't really very good, notable, or really much, I suppose... And you weren't that good of a noob. (It was a little too stupid.)--  fetch  comms  ☛ 04:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know exactly what happened with all this... but just being retailed software does not constitute notability (especially your articles) and I think that some people are getting a little tired of WP:NEWT already... Anyhow, are you still working on Cracked tooth syndrome?--  fetch  comms  ☛ 20:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * NEWT issue was resolved last night on Administrator's Notice Board for Incidents as "Agree to disagree in the strongest terms". I'm going to work on it some if I find more info. but at the moment I'm busy working on a new subpage on reliable references on topics for editors.  IShadowed  ✰  20:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:NEWT vs. CSD
Except that not all software is notable.. If I sat here right now and coded a little piece of software whose only function was to display flashing text that said "Hi World", and made it available, then under what you just said on my talk page it would be eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia as, and I quote: "These articles are notable as they are software". Nevermind that at least two of the articles were so poorly done as to be rightfully deleted under A1. (No context). Futhermore, while I can see the noble intent in the WP:NEWT project, the fact is that there's enough problems with poorly done articles and stuff to clean up on WP as-is without experienced editors, under the guise of a project, adding even more problems. Wikipedia would be better served, IMO, if you guys would just introduce the articles properly - assuming they're actually legitimate - in the first place, instead of using them to prove a point. DJ Bullfish  04:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * However, this software is notable as I didn't "sit down and write it", and they are sold by legit companies.  IShadowed  ✰  05:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, that does not prove notability. I love NEWT, but please make sure to pick something that would survive an AFD next time. Tim Song (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

ANI
see here Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 05:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * However, it's software still asserts notability.  IShadowed  ✰  05:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
I have a question... Airplaneman talk 04:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

my article
hi I'm sure it appeared that you were doing the right thing in putting my article up for speedy deletion but there are many other articles that have a red link to this article and its a very politically relevant topic. As I'm inexperienced I thought I would write something small and then post in the discussion talk place so I could build the article with other editors. Please do not remove the article without a large diiscussion and clear reasoning as this is a relevant article that needs improvment rather than deletion. Please remoove the tab and get some experienced editors on board. Thanks and all the best David.Baratheon (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 21:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks. (Actually, I've been told to be more careful with CSDs, so I might not be as hasty with some as I was...)--  fetch  comms  ☛ 16:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Me too... Except now I actually try ans take time to check the author of possibly OK articles (I accidently csdd one by an admin! :P)--  fetch  comms  ☛ 16:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy declined
Hi, I declined your speedy deletion request of Go'way because A7 does not cover language use. I have prodded the article for deletion. Lady of  Shalott  17:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I wasn't sure what to tag it as... I will keep the A7 'rules' in mind :)  IShadowed  ✰  17:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
huh? what the F__K? Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. please retract the totally inappropriate warning template that you placed on my page  Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I will retract the notice, however, I ask that you STOP making personal attacks and that you refrain from incorrect CSDing.  IShadowed  ✰  17:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)