User:Iamasushi/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Peru–Yale University dispute

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Referenced this article for Discussion Post #1, regarding the Machu Picchu and artifact repatriation. Overall article summarized relevant information quite well, with working, accurate citations.

Evaluate the article
Good lead section, with introductory sentence, descriptions of major sections, and relatively concise.

Article contains relevant, up to date content, equally representing both sides of the argument.

Tone remains neutral, with no evidence of bias. No claims or persuasive intents are evident, and no side is over/under represented.

All information contains sources covering broad range of information. However, although some sources are from academic peer-reviewed journals, a lot of sources are from news outlets or other sources of media, such as Yale Alumni, CNN, Christian Science Monitor, or Indian Country Today.

Article is well organized and concise.

Images seem to adhere to copyright regulations.