User:Iamkyletso/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Arrowsmith School

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is related to our course. It matter because it talks about a school in Toronto that helps students with dyabilities learn. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was going to explain how Arrowsmith school taught disabled students.

Evaluate the article
The lead section's introductory provided enough information on what the article is about. The lead does include a brief description of the major sections of the article. The lead is not that concise. There is too much information about the background history of the school in the first paragraph. The content is relevant to the topic and is up to date. There is no content missing, and there is no content that does not belong. The article discusses content on disabled students. The article was not biased and instead neutral. In fact, it was very informative. The article is backed up by reliable secondary sources, which are current and thorough. The article is easy to read, has no grammatical errors, and is well-organized. There is only one image. I think there should be more images on how the students are learning in the arrowhead program. This article as been rated c-class and of low importance in the Talk section. Some discussions in the Talk section talk about how disorganized the article is. From my perspective, I think the article is good overall, but it should be more visually appealing.