User:IanWilliams25/Controversies in autism/Casseygray Peer Review

General info
IanWilliams25
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IanWilliams25/Controversies_in_autism?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

LEAD

I think for your lead paragraph in your sandbox draft you have it laid out well. The bullet points make it easier to see your POV.

CONTENT

Content is lacking a little only because you are beginning to get the neutral vs non-neutral POV's and determining which is which, which is a great strategy. This will allow you to be more broad in your work. Maybe begin to pull from multiple sources on multiple sides.

TONE AND BALANCE

Like I said last time you are doing a great job on neutrality in the article, so keep it up.

SOURCE AND REFERENCES

I think you have your sources laid out well and they seem to be fine.

ORGANIZATION

It is organized in bullet point format vs paragraph format currently which is fine as you're laying everything out.

MEDIA

No media as of yet

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS

I think it's coming along great!