User:Iander2/Nine Spaces Nine Trees/Gjoe1973 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Iander2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Iander2/Nine_Spaces_Nine_Trees?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Spaces_Nine_Trees

Evaluate the drafted changes
So far your article is off to a good start, I began the peer review on 1/24/23 and I expect you may add more to it as the week goes on. I will do my best to update the review if more is added to it.

In the lead section there is a good introductory sentence "Nine Spaces Nine Trees (sometimes referred to as Nine Spaces, Nine Trees or 9 Spaces 9 Trees) ..." which briefly describes the rest of the article. I would recommend making some changes to the content of this paragraph. Currently you mention the condition of the artwork in reference to the Smithsonian, but do not mention this again further in the article. The lead or summary section should describe (not in to much detail) what will be in the article later. I might mention something about the author Robert Irwin, the idea that there is a specific meaning to the piece and mention that the piece has history in the Seattle area and so on with other sub sections. With this I did add a bit of explaining to the articles sections in your lead.

All of the current the current content in the draft pertains to the topic and all the sources and content are from the last 20 years. Which is still relevant as the art installation was created in the early 2000s. Once you add your section on Robert Irwin make sure to include the main article at the top of the paragraph I can insert it but this just gives a nod to the other article that is solely about the person to be referenced.

Overall, your tone remains neutral throughout the article. I'm not sure if about what other viewpoints you could convey about Nine Spaces Nine Trees but I would make sure to check if there is another side to the story that could be conveyed.

When looking at your sources I found that https://www.arts.wa.gov/artwork/ came to a page stating that there was invalid request. Other than that all of your links work and seem to be valid sources.