User:Ibell3772/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Porc-Epic Cave

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was created by a similar program to ours. My first impressions of this article are pretty positive, it seems like it has a lot of good information.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: good introductory sentence and goes over the sections of the article. No info that isn't in the rest of the article, but maybe a little overly detailed?

Content: All the article's content is relevant and up to date. I think there should be more discussion of when the site was dated to, it's mentioned in passing a couple of times but never in detail.

Tone and Balance: Seems neutral but there aren't very many places to take sides on the topic

Sources and References: There's a good amount of sources for the article, many of which are current. They seem like the best ones available, and are diverse as far as I can tell. All of the info in the article that needs to have a source has one.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is well-organized, but the writing isn't amazing. There aren't any major grammatical/spelling errors that I could see, but it feels kind of stilted and not like most Wikipedia articles (I'm not sure exactly how though).

Images and Media: there are no images, but there's a map which is helpful

Talk page discussion: The talk page doesn't have any discussion on it. It's on the Archaeology and Africa Wikiprojects and is rated C-class.

Impressions: This article seems pretty good. It has a good amount of information, but the writing seems a little off and it could expand on some details. Overall, I think it's pretty much complete.