User:Ibrahim Saleh Alsannat/Draft:Marton Robinson/Ibrahim Saleh Alsannat Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marton Robinson


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft:Marton Robinson
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is sufficiently presented with current and accurate information about the artist being talked about. It introduces the topic clearly and offers precise but important details on the background of the artist, what inspires his art and his current involvements. It is perfect because it could more details could be added to the body of the article.

content

The content is up-to-date and accurate including important information to address equity gaps as Wikipedia targets. More details could be added to the body sections to explain more about the art and information offered. However, it is highly informative and precise as it is currently.

Tone and Balance

The tone used is neutral and the representation is equal without over-representation or under-representation. The content does not persuade the leader towards any position since it just presents facts about the artist.

Sources and References

The sources are fine as they are for now since they are diverse enough and properly utilized in the content written. However, as the draft is expanded, there is need to include more sources maybe academic books and journals.

Organization

The content is well-written without major grammatical or spelling errors. Also, it is organized properly into clear sections that guide the reader through it.

Images and Media

There are currently no images added which would be a necessary change in the future. When the images are added, let them be well-caption and follow copyright regulations set by Wikipedia. This is an important area of improvement for the article.

New Article

The topic is sufficiently notable and the link well-discoverable. The list of the sources is sufficient though not enough for the final article as it might contain a lot of content. Otherwise, it would be good to include a book or a journal in the future.

Overall Impression

The article is somewhat complete in the sense that it covers all sections well. However, it can be improved by including more details under each section. Its strengths include good impression, good sources and proper organization.