User:Icatalan/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Reclaimed water

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose reclaimed water because it is important to conserving water and reusing water that could help people who may not have access and help to reduce the use of water.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * 1) yes
 * 2) includes brief summary of article in lead
 * 3) all information in lead is mentioned later in article
 * 4) it is concise
 * 5) content is relevant
 * 6) up to date, most sources are from past 5 years
 * 7) some missing content
 * 8) does address barriers in implementation
 * 9) neutral point of view
 * 10) viewpoints are all equally represented
 * 11) not many fringe opinion mentioned ?
 * 12) no persuasion, mainly informative
 * 13) some sources are needed for claims made
 * 14) sources are thorough
 * 15) mostly current sources, this question is somewhat redundant there was another question that asked if it was all up to date
 * 16) yes
 * 17) sources are of very high quality
 * 18) links work
 * 19) well written
 * 20) no errors I noticed
 * 21) well organized
 * 22) not many images but the ones included are good
 * 23) images are well captioned
 * 24) adhere to copyright rules
 * 25) not visually appealing in my opinion
 * 26) how to label certain sections are talked about, more information on individual countries systems
 * 27) b class top importance
 * 28) wiki is talking about how to present it bc everyone working on the article is researching the topic, we haven't necessarily coverd this topic in depth yet.
 * 29) good article
 * 30) very informative
 * 31) more pictures and sources
 * 32) it is well developed

~