User:IcecreamPenguin/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Artificial organ

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I find the idea of artificial organs very interesting because so many people struggle to find organ donors who are compatible. This article could be a gateway to bringing to light the importance of this topic. My first impression when picking this article was that artificial is something that is built from something else almost like a copy.

Evaluate the article
The article does a good job of giving the information in a straightforward way. It doesn't bounce around to sub topics which would take away from the article. There is only one part of the article that mentions a dialysis machine but it is used to compare what is considered an artificial organ and what is not so it has a purpose to being in the article. I would say that the article is somewhat out of date as the last change was made in 2016, I would be curious to find out if anything else has developed with artificial organs. I was not able to determine and equity gaps in the article, It did a great job of displaying the necessary information and nothing else. I wish that the article had some updates because I would consider this article out of date. The article is completely neutral as it stays on topic and doesn't give any bias towards one side of the argument. There is certain topics within the article that were under represented, I would say that the part about the trachea and the bladder were only one paragraph which may be all that was needed, however there are other sections that have multiple paragraphs on a single part like limbs, ears, and the heart. Trying to click on different citations brought you directly to the article which is important because is give credibility to the original person. Using the citations I checked I would say that there was reliable sources for each fact and a bias was not present. When I checked the talk page of the article I found that other people were mentioning that the article seemed out of date as well. There was also mention about some updates that were made, Which I found to be very cool that the article had seen updates since it was originally posted. The article received a C-Class rating on the content scale.