User:Iddibass123/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * FIVB Volleyball Men's world cup: FIVB Volleyball Men's World Cup
 * I like watching volleyball

Lead evaluation
The lead was well explained. It explained what the topic is, and how it works, and how long it's been going on. All the info given are significant and related to the major section

Content

Content evaluation
The article is up to stating that Brazil was the 2019 current champions. The article's topic is relevant and has info that's where it's needed to be.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding question

Tone and balance evaluation
The article isn't biased and is neutral. When a fact is stated it is stated with no favoritism. Countries are mentioned when they are the winners of the year that is being mentioned.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Sources and references evaluation
The article is based of one source and that source and is copied of that one source and it says that it must not be deleted as long as that latter page exist

Organization

 * Guiding questions

Organization evaluation
The article is well-written and easy to understand, with no grammatical errors or spelling. It is organized by having the history of FIVB volleyball as the first heading, then the winners of each year starting from the beginning to the year of 2019, and then the "Competition Formula" as the last heading which explains in a thorough manner of how teams are decided to enter the Olympics.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

Images and media evaluation
The article has multiple images that are shown at the end after the writings. The images stand out by having the colors of the flags from different countries in a big chart.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

Talk page evaluation
There is no talk page. It's part of a Wikiproject Volleyball whose goal is to improve volleyball and convince others about their opinion of volleyball.

Anyone can join.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding question

Overall evaluation
The article is well-written in terms of explanation for example it's history and how the process works. I don't think anything needs to be fixed instead I think more stuff should be added. The article is too simple. I think some outside factors, people, original ideas/thoughts of the topic of when it first started should be added.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: