User:Idk jonesken/Loimia medusa/BlessedAni Peer Review

General info
Idk jonesken
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Idk jonesken/Loimia medusa
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I really liked how organized the sandbox looks, as well as the references looks well organized as well.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) This article talks about the species and describes the shape of it as well. There could be more information on what family it comes from.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Based on the sandbox, I don't see subtitles but the information stated definitely looks great.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? The information stated is well done, I would add more additional information on the species habitat, lifestyle and family it comes from.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes the writing style seems clear to me as I was reading.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes, as I was reading I can see that each statement has a little number linked.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes, I see 4 references listed at the bottom of the sandbox.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? I do not see the sources linked to a number yet, but could always be added.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The quality of these sources look great and looks good to where people will probably look into it as they finish reading the article.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? One suggestion I would make is to add different subtitles / sections to your draft. It is good to let people know what you are talking about in each section. Also I would add pictures of your species as well.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I think there can be a little more additional things added before going public to the world. However the information is there.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The main thing to improve is put your information in sections and add pictures.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I need to apply the same things to my article as well. I need pictures and I also need more additional information in some sections as well.