User:Idm123/Caudal luring/Alwayh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Idm123


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Idm123/Caudal luring
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Caudal luring

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi there, here is my peer review of your proposed updates to the caudal luring article.

Lead
I think your introductory sentence is great, but I do feel you should add "to attract prey" or something similar at the end of it to fully summarize the concept. This would better align it with the guiding question "Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?"

I think your final sentence, "This behavior is seen in snakes, primarily juveniles, sharks and eels," is an excellent replacement for the current sentence on species. The current sentence feels uncertain, while yours sounds more matter-of-fact.

I like your choice to remove the second paragraph. It feels unnecessarily in the article and definitely does not belong in the lead section.

Body
I think your addition to the second paragraph on snakes is a good choice, as it adds findings of more recent literature and disputes that tail colour is responsible for success. Your eel paragraph adds much more to the article as well. I would like to see a bit more added to the body of the article, though I do recognize that depending on the existing literature that may not be possible.

Overall, the proposed changes are good but I would like to see more added to the article if possible. Pictures may also be nice, perhaps of the eels caudal lights or the tail of the tasselled wobbegong.