User:Ignis centralis/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Tycho Brahe
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

I chose this article to evaluate because it is relevant to the topic we are covering at the moment. Additionally, Tycho Brahe is interesting because of the noted lucks he gets.

Lead

 * Guiding questions
 * The Lead does include an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic but it is overly detailed.
 * The Lead includes a great summary that details the key points of the article's major sections in detail. The Lead includes all
 * relevant information that was necessarily tied to the article. Overall, the Lead is overly detailed can be summed up more concisely.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The general content of the article is entirely relevant to the topic. The content is

up-to-date since its information has been evaluated consistently over a period of time.

There is sufficient amount of content to support this article where there is no record

of irrelevancy nor missing content in this article. There isn't a significant equity gap

found in this article. The contents of this article perfectly addresses topics related

historically underrepresented topics.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is perfectly neutral in tone. There is no bias not any stance taken on a particular position.
 * No viewpoints were dramatic on overrepresented or underrepresented parts. The article is very informative
 * and does not provide any statement or means to persuade a reader to be in a favor of a position,


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

The facts are all backed by reliable secondary sources of information. Sources are thorough and detailed appropriately.

Information can be found available from the topic. The sources are current and available for public use. Sources showed

a wide variety of authors' works. Historically marginalized individuals were given the appropriate positions possible. All links

are working and available.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

The article is very well-written as it detailed, clear and easy to read but not very concise. It is comprehensible in detail.

The article is perfect in its grammatical structure with no errors found at all. The article is well-organized as it breaks down

major sections of the topic.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

Images were found to enhance understanding of the topic. The images are well-captioned and adhere to Wikipedia's

copyright regulations. All images were laid out appropriately and can be visually appealing.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * Conversations involved grammatical errors and rephrasing statements and phrases.

The article is rated B-class. It is part of several WikiProjects such as History of Science,

Denmark, Astrology, Astronomy and more. Wikipedia goes into more detail to general parts

while the class goes into specific parts of the article.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

The article's status is Delisted good article. The article's strength is the sources and the overall structure of the information.

The article can be improved by covering more topics and shortening detailed paragraphs into concise paragraphs. The article

is nearly complete as it needs a little more information for perfection. It has been greatly developed and more work will soon

see the article being perfect.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: