User:Igutierrez3/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dietitian

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is relating to my major in FCS and I would like to know more general information that i may have skipped on before.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Starting off this article, it's pretty straight forward in defining the role dietitians have in their expertise and practice. The articles brief does a great job in leading to more major portions of the page as it starts off by making the definition simple to understand and further elaborates with deeper information regarding the profession. Most of the information mentioned goes into the rest of the page and does so in a pretty precise manner. Most of the information content wise is relevant but not as up to date with recent edits. There is barely any changes apparent within the most recent years for sources but a majority has been made in the year 2011. Overall, the information. seems to cover a lot from the United states and the dietetic background it has but I would say it is a bit biased on that end and excludes quite a but of info for other countries and related topics to it. The reader may feel more informed regarding dietetic background in the united states but might still lack the understanding of how the practice translates to other countries. Looking over the sources a majority of them appear to be well rounded and select few can be seen to have professional organizations covering major information mentioned in the page. However, there is quite a hand full of sources that come from poorer sources though they are diverse. These links still prove to work but could be updated to more recent times like mentioned before. As for general organization, I will say that it is quite easy to follow and a lot of the titles make sense with the order of the writing. There is minimal grammar errors that I have noticed present and it does not distract me at all with the way that it is ordered. One thing I would suggest is for each country to have a bigger section instead of being separated after each new topic is brought up. This article has no images but I still do not see this as an issue overall as the information seems pretty straight forward with no need to express complicated imagery. It can benefit to see a little bit of how these workers may dress up on. different sites and to see the equipment that they may use in their practice. Overall I think that this article does a great job for an American student learning more about this profession as well as what is needed to be apart of it. I do think that it can use more work on updating information to more recent times outside the 21st century where most of the information was based on. Additionally, having more information on. Countries outside of America will help with its well roundedness of reliability around the world and make it stand out. Other than that, fixing a but of the order of information so that each country can be recognized fairly seem to be the only things holding this page back from being well developed.