User:Iisabellasanch/User:Seskaff/tourism in peru/Iisabellasanch Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Seskaff


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Seskaff/tourism in peru
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tourism in Peru

Evaluate the drafted changes
 Content: 

The content added- a brief introduction to Ecotourism and the formation/impact of surf tourism- is relevant to the topic: Tourism in Peru. The content added contains all the necessary information for each subsection- providing adequate and up to date background information (i.e. El Niño being a major catalyst for surf tourism in Peru).

 Tone and Balance: 

The content added is neutral and does not persuade the reader in any way. The information, in other words, is presented through an unbiased and balanced tone; view points are neither overrepresented nor underrepresented.

 Sources and References: 

The content added is backed by other articles from Wikipedia. These articles are current, neutral, and provide even more background information to the content added. They are also conveniently linked throughout- avoiding any possible scenarios of plagiarism. Perhaps peer-reviewed articles could be implemented somewhere- to provide a broader range of sources. A peer-reviewed article on illegal logging or environmental degradation would fit well, as it could provide more information on the impact of these practices on the economy and environment of Peru.

 Organization: 

The content added is written using simple syntax and unambiguous words- making it easy to understand and process. The content added does not contain any grammatical or spelling errors, is not redundant, and is organized well. I especially like the elaboration on surf tourism, as the original text did not provide any background information or history on the formation of surf tourism in Peru.

 Overall Impressions: 

By providing a brief introduction to ecotourism- specifically ecotourism in Peru- and the history of surf tourism in Peru, the quality of the article greatly improves. In order for the article to contain all viewpoints and perceptions, though, an implementation of peer-reviewed articles must occur. I think incorporating peer-reviewed articles to the Ecotourism section- especially to the sentences dedicated to environmental degradation and illegal logging- would be great. Other than that, I think the content added is methodically organized, necessary, neutral, and benefits the overall article. Awesome job!